تخصیص بهینه بار آلودگی یکی از مهمترین مسائل در حوزه مدیریت کیفی منابع آب است. در این مسئله ذینفعان متعددی با اهداف ارتقای شرایط کیفیت آب و پرداخت هزینههای کمتر بابت تصفیه واحدهای آلاینده حضور دارند. با توجه به ماهیت چندگانه و متضاد اهداف در اینگونه مسائل، مجموعهای از جبهه پرتوی بهینه بهعنوان پاسخ ارائه میشود که انتخاب یکی از این پاسخها، میتواند سبب ایجاد تعارضاتی شود. بهمنظور مواجهه با تعارضات میان ذینفعان، استفاده از مدلها و مفاهیم تئوری بازیها توصیه میشود. در این پژوهش از رویکرد شبیهسازی- بهینهسازی با استفاده از مدل شبیهسازی QUAL2Kw و الگوریتم بهینهسازی هوش جمعی ذرات بهمنظور تخصیص بهینه بار آلودگیهای CBOD امتداد رودخانه قشلاق استفاده شد. بهمنظور مواجهه با تعارضات اهداف ذینفعان حاضر در بهرهبرداری از منابع آب این رودخانه از رویکرد تئوری بازیها و تکنیکهای رهبر-پیرو و تئوری چانهزنی نش استفاده میشود. بر اساس نتایج حاصل در مسئله این پژوهش، هزینههای احداث، نگهداری و بهرهبرداری تصفیهخانهها در بازی استاکلبرگ و تئوری چانهزنی نش بهترتیب 57/191 و 39/293 میلیارد ریال و جریمههای تخطی از استانداردهای سازمان حفاظت محیط زیست در این دو بازی بهترتیب 86/31 و 89/3 میلیارد ریال برآورد شد. همچنین تعرفه جریمه در بازی استاکلبرگ و تئوری چانهزنی نش بهترتیب 75/10 و 3 ریال به ازای هر واحد تخطی از استاندارد مجاز تخلیه CBOD برآورد شد. مقدار تعرفه جریمه برآورد شده در بازی استاکلبرگ بهمقدار تعرفه کنونی سازمان حفاظت محیط زیست بسیار نزدیک است.
Leader-Follower and Nash Bargaining Game Theory Models for Optimum Waste Load Allocation, Gheshlagh River as Case Study
نویسندگان [English]
Motahareh Saadatpour1؛ Helaleh Khoshkam2
1Assist. Prof., School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2MSc Graduated Student of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Environment, Karaj, Alborz, Iran
چکیده [English]
Optimum waste load allocation (WLA) is one of the most important problems in water quality management. Multiple beneficiaries participate in water resources operations with the aim to improve water quality and reduce costs of wastewater treatment plants. Due to multiple and sometimes conflict objectives in WLA problems, a set of Pareto optimal solutions is derived with evolutionary algorithms which selecting one of these Pareto fronts could cause some conflicts. To deal with conflicts between current beneficiaries, use of game theory concepts and models is recommended. In this research, simulation-optimization approach was applied by QUAL2Kw simulation model and particle swarm optimization (PSO) as optimization algorithm to assign CBOD point source pollutions along Gheshlagh River. To deal with conflicts of goals between present beneficiaries for operating from water resources of the river, the level leader-follower and the Nash bargaining game theory models were applied. The results showed that the construction, maintenance and operation costs of the treatment plants for leader-follower and Nash bargaining game theories are 191.57 and 293.39 billion Rial and the penalties for violating Iran environmental protection agency (EPA) standard is 31.86 and 3.89 billion Rial respectively. Furthermore, the penalty tariff for Stackelberg and Nash bargaining game theories estimated 10.75 and 3 Rial per each violation unit of allowed CBOD discharge standard respectively. The estimated penalty tariff in Stackelberg game is so close to current Iran EPA penalty tariff.
Afshar, A., Kazemi, H. & Saadatpour, M., 2011, "Particle swarm optimization for automatic calibration of large scale Water Quality Model (CE-QUAL-W2): Application to Karkheh Reservoir, Iran", Water Resource Management, 25, 2613-2632.
Al-Ani, D., 2012, "Energy optimization strategy for system-operational problems", PhD Thesis, McMaster University, Canada.
Anandalingam, G. & Apprey, V., 1991, "Multi-level programming and conflict resolution", European Journal of Operational Research, 51, 233-247.
Asheghmoala, M., Fazel, A.M. & Homami, M., 2014, "The effect of river assimilative capacity in determination of allowable water quality parameters in sewages", Environmental Science and Engineering, 1 (4), 37-49. (In Persian)
Benchekroun, H. & Long, N.V., 2001, Leader and follower: A differential game model, McGill University and CIRANO, Montreal, Canada.
Damghani, K.K., Abtahi, A.R. & Tavana, M., 2013, "A new multi-objective particle swarm optimization method for solving reliability redundancy allocation problems", Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 111, 58-75.
Department of Environment (DoE), 2016, "Environmental crime", Viewed 29 July 2016, http://hse.nigc.ir/Portal/File/ShowFile.aspx? > . (In Persian)
Jafari Salim, B., 2009, "Identification of pollution sources and pollution load determination in Gheshlagh river", MSc Thesis, College of Environment, Tehran University. (In Persian)
Kicsiny, R., Piscopo, V., Scarelli, A. & Varga, Z., 2014, "Dynamic Stackelberg game model for water rationalization in drought emergency", Journal of Hydrology, 517, 557-565.
Khoshkam, H., 2016, "Simulation-optimization approach for waste load allocation in river", MSc Thesis, College of Environment, Karaj, Iran. (In Persian)
Nikoo, M.R., Kerachian, R. & Azadnia, A.A., 2012, "A fuzzy transformation model for water and waste load allocation in rivers", Proceedings of International Conference on Ecological, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Dubai, 7-8 th January.
Madani, K., 2010, "Game theory and water resources", Journal of Hydrology, 381, 225-238.
Lee, C.S., 2012, "Multi-objective game-theory models for conflict analysis in reservoir watershed management", Chemosphere, 87, 608-613.
Madani, K., Zarezadeh, M. & Morid, S., 2014, "A new framework for resolving conflicts over transboundary rivers using bankruptcy methods", Hydrology Earth System Science, 18, 3055-3068.
Nikoo, M.R., BahmanBeiglou, P.H. & Mahjouri, N., 2016, "Optimizing multiple-pollutant waste load allocation in rivers: an interval parameter game theoretic model", Water Resources Management, 30(12), 4201-4220.
Pelletier, G. & Chapra, S., 2008, "QUAL2Kw: Theory and documentation; A modeling Framework for simulating river and stream water quality: Documentation and users manual", Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Tufts University, Medford, MA.
Safari, N., Zarghami, M. & Szidarovszky, F., 2014, "Nash bargaining and leader–follower models in water allocation: Application to the Zarrinehrud River basin, Iran", Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38, 1959-1968.
Szidarovszky, F., 2008, Game Theory, Classnotes of Game Theory Workshop, Sharif University.
Xu, J., Lv, C., Zhang, M., Yao, L. & Zeng, Z., 2015, "Equilibrium strategy-based optimization method for the coal-water conflict: A perspective from China", Journal of Environmental Management, 160, 312-323.
Zhao, L., Qian, Y., Huang, R., Li, C., Xue, J. & Hu, Y., 2012, "Model of transfer tax on transboundary water pollution in China’s river basin", Operations Research Letters, 40, 218-222.